Archive for Author: taxlaw

Judge in a courtroom striking the gavel.

How the Canadian Tax Court Sees ‘Surplus Stripping’ and GAAR: Insights on Abusive Tax Avoidance from D’Arcy v. The King, 2025 TCC 128

Introduction – GAAR, Surplus Stripping and the Use of PUC Averaging The general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) in section 245 of the Income Tax Act is designed to prevent taxpayers from obtaining tax benefits through transactions that, while compliant with the literal wording of the Act, frustrate its object, spirit,...

Read More
A row of call centre reps wearing headsets, using computers and talking to clients.

Canadian Taxpayers Eagerly Await CRA’s 100-Day Service Improvement Plan to Answer More Calls with Live Humans

Introduction The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) recently announced its 100-Day Service Improvement Plan, running from September 2 to December 11, 2025. This initiative comes after months of mounting criticism about slow call centre response times, processing backlogs, and general difficulties Canadians have faced when dealing with the Agency. The...

Read More
A judge's gavel on top of the Trinidadian flag.

The Methanex Case: Trinidad and Tobago Courts Uphold International Tax Principles, Scrutinize ‘Treaty Shopping’ and Lessons for Canadian Multinational Corporations

Overview On April 22, 2025, the Judicial Committee of the U.K. Privy Council released its decision in Methanex Trinidad v. Board of Inland Revenue ( UKPC 20). The ruling overturned earlier judgments of Trinidad and Tobago’s Tax Appeal Board and Court of Appeal, both of which had upheld withholding...

Read More
Closeup on a dark-brown wooden judge's gavel on a lighter-brown wood desk.

When CRA Won’t Cancel Interest, Penalties (Subsection 220(3.1), Taxpayer Relief), You can Challenge the Decision through Judicial Review: Minion v The King (2025 FC 1461)

Taxpayer Relief and the Limits of CRA’s Discretion Subsection 220(3.1) of the Income Tax Act authorizes CRA to waive or cancel interest and penalties when fairness requires. The CRA applies this provision through its taxpayer relief program in accordance with Information Circular IC07-1R1, Taxpayer Relief Provisions (August 18, 2017)....

Read More
Hand-drawn illustration of an empty courtroom.

Spennie Holdings Inc. v. AGC: Tax Court is exclusive forum for Tax Reassessment Disputes, not Judicial Review Process

Introduction The Federal Court’s recent decision in Spennie Holdings Inc. et al v. Attorney General of Canada (T-1197-25, released August 15, 2025) reaffirms established Canadian tax law. Taxpayers cannot circumvent the statutory appeal process in the Tax Court of Canada by filing judicial review applications in the Federal Court. This ruling...

Read More
A Canadian tax lawyer's insights on what qualifies, what doesn't, and the tax benefits of a not-for-profit organization in Canada.

Improve your understanding of not-for-profit status in Canada: What qualifies and what doesn’t, plus tax benefits

CRA’s view vs. statutory language: Interpreting not-for-profit qualification The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) explains that for an entity to qualify as a non-profit organization under Section 149 (l) of the Income Tax Act (ITA), it must be organized and operated exclusively for social welfare, civic improvement, pleasure, recreation, or...

Read More